Topul influentei pe Twitter
Conform http://www.twitalyzer.com un instrument serios de masurare.
| Username | Influence | Trend | Signal/Noise | Generosity | Velocity | Clout |
| webupd8 | 38.3 | 0.0% | 100.00% | 91.70% | 96.3% | 57.3% |
| FlashGates | 10.4 | 0.0% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 100.00% | 0.50% |
| revistapresei | 10.3 | 0.00% | 100.0% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.5% |
| zoso | 10.2 | -19.8% | 82.0% | 0.0% | 42.90% | 23.20% |
| ltaloi | 9.9 | -3.1% | 93.1% | 71.9% | 64.1% | 13.50% |
| ecostin | 9.6 | -8.0% | 89.9% | 11.30% | 44.80% | 21.30% |
| GeoAtreides | 8.6 | 0.0% | 69.5% | 1.60% | 51.60% | 18.50% |
| piticu21 | 7.3 | 0.00% | 78.5% | 1.50% | 34.70% | 15.90% |
| Mediafax | 5.2 | 0.0% | 100.00% | 0.0% | 100.00% | 0.2% |
| manafu | 5.1 | -4.1% | 67.2% | 16.40% | 8.10% | 12.10% |
| Username | Influence | Trend | Signal/Noise | Generosity | Velocity | Clout |
| alina_popescu | 5.0 | 0.00% | 97.50% | 38.80% | 31.60% | 9.10% |
| andymihail | 4.0 | 0.00% | 86.20% | 9.20% | 17.30% | 7.00% |
| pyuric | 3.8 | 0.00% | 64.10% | 5.80% | 13.70% | 9.30% |
| Arhi | 3.7 | 0.00% | 86.50% | 7.50% | 17.70% | 7.60% |
| floringrozea | 3.7 | -2.6% | 59.20% | 9.50% | 19.60% | 7.40% |
| bobbyvoicu | 2.9 | -3.7% | 77.60% | 32.70% | 6.50% | 6.40% |
| petre_fluerasu | 2.8 | 0.00% | 70.00% | 0.90% | 28.40% | 4.50% |
| onicoara | 2.8 | 0.00% | 61.90% | 9.50% | 8.40% | 6.70% |
| vladgeorgescu | 2.6 | 0.00% | 91.70% | 36.70% | 8.00% | 4.80% |
| anamilitaru | 2.5 | 0.00% | 84.70% | 18.40% | 13.10% | 4.40% |
Datele pentru Zoso sunt:
Recent Activity
1,299 Followers
5 Friends
301 Updates
324 References
176 References to Others
29 Retweets
2 Retweeting Others
260 Twitter Ratio
102 URLs Cited
0 Hashtags Used
Manafu
Recent Activity
1,966 Followers
114 Friends
56 Updates
170 References
13 References to Others
26 Retweets
3 Retweeting Others
17 Twitter Ratio
25 URLs Cited
Ecostin
Recent Activity
778 Followers
13 Friends
327 Updates
303 References
234 References to Others
34 Retweets
17 Retweeting Others
60 Twitter Ratio
91 URLs Cited
5 Hashtags Used
Oare cat va mai dura pana va intra si Mircea Badea pe Twitter 
?
Cititi si
http://manafu.blogspot.com/2009/04/blogs-early-adopters-vs-vedete.html
http://capslock.ro/2009/04/e-doar-o-problema-de-timp.html
http://www.zoso.ro/2009/04/twitter-conversatia-n-care-nimeni-nu-asculta.html
http://refresh.ro/2009/02/cine-foloseste-twitter-in-romania/
(*1) As Twitter becomes increasingly important to online communication, the creators of the Twitalyzer believe that the need to measure the impact of our efforts in Twitter will increase a commensurate amount. While some believe that “popularity” is an appropriate measure of success, we disagree, eschewing this easily gamed metric in favor of something more robust, more fair, and more difficult to cheat.
The Twitalyzer solution is our measure of “influence in Twitter” calculated based on:
- Your relative reach in Twitter, measured by the number of followers you have
- Your relative authority, measured by the number of times you are “retweeted“
- Your relative generosity, measured by the number of times you “retweet” others
- Your relative clout, measured by the number of times you are referenced by others
- Your relative velocity, measured by the number of updates you publish over a seven day period
Each of these measures are weighted but otherwise the calculation is incredibly simple. We believe that what you get is a measure of success in Twitter that can be applied in a variety of ways. We know this measure is not perfect but, well, we’re not perfect and we don’t believe in holding software to a higher standard that we ourselves live up to.
Comments
By Ionut Oprea on April 21st, 2009 at 10:58 am
Twitalyzer este un instrument cantitativ, pur teoretic, si care cam amesteca oalele.
“The Twitalyzer solution is our measure of “influence in Twitter” calculated based on:
* Your relative reach in Twitter, measured by the number of followers you have
* Your relative authority, measured by the number of times you are “retweeted”
* Your relative generosity, measured by the number of times you “retweet” others
* Your relative clout, measured by the number of times you are referenced by others
* Your relative velocity, measured by the number of updates you publish over a seven day period”
“
By alex on April 21st, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Ionut, datele astea sunt un punct de plecare pentru o analiza. Si mie imi vine greu sa cred ca GeoAtreides e mai influent pe Twitter decat Manafu sau BobbyVoicu.Dar am pus datele brute (neperiate) tocmai pentru ca oricine sa poata sa traga pe baza lor propriile concluzii.Noi am facut si o analiza calitativa pentru conturile de Twitter ale unor bloggeri din top (zoso, manafu, ecostin, piticu21, bobbyvoicu) dar datele alea o sa le publicam in viitor
.
.Toti pictorii folosesc pensule, dar nu toti pot picta ca Picasso.
Nu cred ca cineva poate sa spuna ca Ecostin, Zoso si Manafu nu sunt printre cei mai influenti utilizatori Twitter din Romania.
Iar daca vorbim despre instrumente, ele sunt importante, dar mai important este felul in care sunt folosite
By Costin on April 22nd, 2009 at 12:07 am
Comparatia cu Picasso nu face decat sa ma maguleasca :-p
By alex on April 22nd, 2009 at 8:58 am
Zoso e Picasso , tu mai degraba Monet- care lucra in tuse largi, afirmate si spontane
Trackbacks